Showing posts with label 9950. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 9950. Show all posts

Saturday, November 01, 2008

5 Mainstream Quad-Core Processors Compared

q8200 image

X-bit Labs recently compared five mainstream processors: four Core 2 Quads from Intel, and one Phenom X4 from AMD.

Phenom X4 9950 Specs:

  • Codename: Agena
  • 2.6GHz Clock Frequency
  • 2000MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [64KB +64KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 512KB L2 cache
  • 2MB L3 cache
  • AM2+ socket
  • 65nm production process
  • 125/140 W TDP
  • Retail price: $174

Core 2 Quad Q6600 Specs:

  • Codename: Kentsfield
  • 2.4GHz Clock Frequency
  • 1067MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [32KB +32KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 4MB L2 cache
  • no L3 cache
  • LGA775 socket
  • 65nm production process
  • 95 W TDP
  • Retail price: $183

Core 2 Quad Q8200 Specs:

  • Codename: Yorkfield
  • 2.33GHz Clock Frequency
  • 1333MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [32KB +32KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 2MB L2 cache
  • no L3 cache
  • LGA775 socket
  • 45nm production process
  • 95 W TDP
  • Retail price: $193

Core 2 Quad Q9300 Specs:

  • Codename: Yorkfield
  • 2.5GHz Clock Frequency
  • 1333MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [32KB +32KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 3MB L2 cache
  • no L3 cache
  • LGA775 socket
  • 45nm production process
  • 95 W TDP
  • Retail price: $266

Core 2 Quad Q9400 Specs:

  • Codename: Yorkfield
  • 2.66GHz Clock Frequency
  • 1333MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [32KB +32KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 3MB L2 cache
  • no L3 cache
  • LGA775 socket
  • 45nm production process
  • 95 W TDP
  • Retail price: $266

"One of the best choices among low-cost quad-core processors is still the old 65nm Core 2 Quad Q6600. Intel has dropped its price so significantly lately that is remains in the spotlight despite its age and relatively high power consumption. Especially since in some applications such as 3D games, for instance, it manages to perform as fast as a more expensive Core 2 Quad Q9300 thanks to large L2 cache. Its overclocking potential is also pretty encouraging. It doesn't require a specific mainboard: you can almost always push its frequency 1.5 times up with just an efficient cooler." [X-bit Labs | Comparative Tests of Inexpensive Quad-Core Processors]

"... the only drawback of Core 2 Quad Q6600 is its relatively high heat dissipation and power consumption, which makes it unfit for quiet and low-power systems. The new Core 2 Quad Q8200 will suit much better for them. Despite much smaller L2 cache, this CPU is pretty fast and outperforms the fastest processor of Intel's competitor - AMD Phenom X4 9950. As a result, Phenom X4 family may be of interest only to those users who want to get a quad-core processor real cheap, but are ready to put up with low overclocking potential, low performance and high power consumption." [X-bit Labs]

AMD fans don't have much of a choice right now, having only the Phenom X4 9950 (or the 2.2GHz X4 9550) as their choices. Intel fans, however, can choose between the Core 2 Quad Q6600 (good performance and overclocking potential) or the Q8200 (for low heat and power consumption).

IceRocket : , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, July 05, 2008

Three New Phenom X4 Processors Tested

phenom x4 logoRecently announced were 3 new Phenom X4 CPUs: 9950 Black Edition (2.6GHz, US$235), 9350e (2.0GHz, US$195), and 9150e (1.8GHz, US$175).

All 3 processors feature:

  • 4 cores
  • (64KB + 64KB) x 4 L1Cache
  • 512KB x 4 L2 Cache
  • 2MB L3 Cache
  • Integrated Dual Channel (up to DDR2-1066) memory controller
  • AM2+ packaging
  • 65nm SOI process technology
  • "Agena" processor codename

The 9950 Black Edition consumes 140 Watts maximu, while the 9350e and 9150e, being the energy-efficient Phenom X4s, consume no more than 65 Watts.

AnandTech.com tested the Phenom X4 9950, 9350e and 9150e processors:

"... AMD's CPU division is finally competitive again. The return to competition isn't because of an increase in performance or architectural changes, it's simply through very aggressive pricing. ... The Phenom X4 9950 BE and 9850 BE are reasonably competitive with the Q9300 and Q6600, although we would still opt for the Intel solutions thanks to lower power consumption and significantly better overclocking potential. ... The Phenom X4 9550 is the sweet spot of AMD's product line and it does do well against Intel's dual-core E8400, as do the X3 8650/8450 against Intel's E7200. " [AnandTech | AMD's Phenom X4 9950, 9350e and 9150e]

HardwareZone.com tested the Phenom X4 9350e and 9150e , and found them to be 'Energy Efficient'at the expense of performance :

"... we can only think of one scenario where the new Phenom entrants would be of potential value and that's when you consider AMD's balanced system slogan, exemplified by AMD's mainstream Cartwell platform. Such a platform would marry an AMD 780G motherboard with a low TDP quad-core processor like these new Phenoms and make for a powerful, yet compact little system to play your Blu-ray movies or equivalent HD video content, with decent gaming potential thrown in. ... As we found in our real-world games testing, the minute you consider discrete graphics for better game performance, an AMD-based system would only hinder your overall graphics performance. So for the performance-concerned enthusiasts, you would do well to stick with an Intel processor. " [HardwareZone | Energy Efficient CPUs Ahoy!]

If you are looking to build a new quad-core system, and care less with overclocking, the Phenom X4 9950 BE looks to be a good processor, being at par with the Q9300 and Q6600 Intel CPUs.

Technorati : , , , , , , , , , , ,