Both processors feature 775-pin packaging, 1.25-1.4 Vcore, 800 MHz bus frequency, 2 MB + 2 MB L2 cache, 65 nm production process, EM64T (Enhanced Memory 64 Technology), and VT (Virtualization Technology).
The Pentium D 920 clocks at 2.8 GHz, while the Pentium D 930 clocks at 3.0 GHz.
The youngest Pentium D processors based on the new Presler core didn't prove up to our expectations. Despite the improvements introduced by the manufacturer such as larger L2 cache, they are still unable to successfully compete against the rivals from the same price group in the majority of tasks. In fact, Pentium D 920 and Pentium D 930 can only prove faster than Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (the youngest dual-core processor from AMD) in office applications and selected synthetic benchmarks. That is why the only way Pentium D can become popular is due to its $60 lower price than that of Athlon 64 X2 3800+. From all other standpoint, it may not be the best purchasing decision to make at this time. [X-bit Labs]
Seems like AMD is also ahead in the dual-core processor category. Would the Conroe-based Intel processors change that?
0 comments:
Post a Comment