Showing posts with label quad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quad. Show all posts

Saturday, November 01, 2008

5 Mainstream Quad-Core Processors Compared

q8200 image

X-bit Labs recently compared five mainstream processors: four Core 2 Quads from Intel, and one Phenom X4 from AMD.

Phenom X4 9950 Specs:

  • Codename: Agena
  • 2.6GHz Clock Frequency
  • 2000MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [64KB +64KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 512KB L2 cache
  • 2MB L3 cache
  • AM2+ socket
  • 65nm production process
  • 125/140 W TDP
  • Retail price: $174

Core 2 Quad Q6600 Specs:

  • Codename: Kentsfield
  • 2.4GHz Clock Frequency
  • 1067MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [32KB +32KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 4MB L2 cache
  • no L3 cache
  • LGA775 socket
  • 65nm production process
  • 95 W TDP
  • Retail price: $183

Core 2 Quad Q8200 Specs:

  • Codename: Yorkfield
  • 2.33GHz Clock Frequency
  • 1333MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [32KB +32KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 2MB L2 cache
  • no L3 cache
  • LGA775 socket
  • 45nm production process
  • 95 W TDP
  • Retail price: $193

Core 2 Quad Q9300 Specs:

  • Codename: Yorkfield
  • 2.5GHz Clock Frequency
  • 1333MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [32KB +32KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 3MB L2 cache
  • no L3 cache
  • LGA775 socket
  • 45nm production process
  • 95 W TDP
  • Retail price: $266

Core 2 Quad Q9400 Specs:

  • Codename: Yorkfield
  • 2.66GHz Clock Frequency
  • 1333MHZ Bus Frequency
  • 4 x [32KB +32KB] L1 cache
  • 4 x 3MB L2 cache
  • no L3 cache
  • LGA775 socket
  • 45nm production process
  • 95 W TDP
  • Retail price: $266

"One of the best choices among low-cost quad-core processors is still the old 65nm Core 2 Quad Q6600. Intel has dropped its price so significantly lately that is remains in the spotlight despite its age and relatively high power consumption. Especially since in some applications such as 3D games, for instance, it manages to perform as fast as a more expensive Core 2 Quad Q9300 thanks to large L2 cache. Its overclocking potential is also pretty encouraging. It doesn't require a specific mainboard: you can almost always push its frequency 1.5 times up with just an efficient cooler." [X-bit Labs | Comparative Tests of Inexpensive Quad-Core Processors]

"... the only drawback of Core 2 Quad Q6600 is its relatively high heat dissipation and power consumption, which makes it unfit for quiet and low-power systems. The new Core 2 Quad Q8200 will suit much better for them. Despite much smaller L2 cache, this CPU is pretty fast and outperforms the fastest processor of Intel's competitor - AMD Phenom X4 9950. As a result, Phenom X4 family may be of interest only to those users who want to get a quad-core processor real cheap, but are ready to put up with low overclocking potential, low performance and high power consumption." [X-bit Labs]

AMD fans don't have much of a choice right now, having only the Phenom X4 9950 (or the 2.2GHz X4 9550) as their choices. Intel fans, however, can choose between the Core 2 Quad Q6600 (good performance and overclocking potential) or the Q8200 (for low heat and power consumption).

IceRocket : , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, April 17, 2008

New AMD Phenom X4 9000 Series Processors Tested

phenom x4AMD has a new Phenom X4 processor lineup that consists of the 9850 'Black Edition', 9750, 9650, and 9550.

Features:

  • Phenom X4 9850 'Black Edition' (US$235)
    • 2.5GHz clock speed
    • 512KB x 4 L2 cache
    • 2MB L3 cache
    • 2.0GHz HyperTransport Bus
    • 2.0GHz memory controller
  • Phenom X4 9750 (US$215)
    • 2.4GHz clock speed
    • 512KB x 4 L2 cache
    • 2MB L3 cache
    • 1.8GHz HyperTransport Bus
    • 1.8GHz memory controller
  • Phenom X4 9650 (OEM only)
    • 2.3GHz clock speed
    • 512KB x 4 L2 cache
    • 2MB L3 cache
    • 1.8GHz HyperTransport Bus
    • 1.8GHz memory controller
  • Phenom X4 9550 (US$209)
    • 2.2GHz clock speed
    • 512KB x 4 L2 cache
    • 2MB L3 cache
    • 1.8GHz HyperTransport Bus
    • 1.8GHz memory controller

HardwareZone wasn't very pleased with the performance of the new Phenoms:

"... Seriously speaking, there is nothing to look-forward to with the AMD Phenom X4 processors with performance not far off from Intel's dual-core solutions. If you need performance, Intel's Core 2 Quad is the answer and they've got performance better than the entire Phenom series more than a year ago. If you're hoping that the future Phenom X4 9950 to have any positive impact, our testing tells us nothing of that sort. ... Don't misunderstand us; the Phenom X4 processor works fine and all, but it's just not living up to expectations set by AMD nor of any impact/consideration when compared with Intel's offerings . " [HardwareZone | AMD's New Phenom X4 9000 Series]

As of now, the Intel Core 2 Quad is the reigning performance champion in the processor realm. If you are already using an AMD platform rig, and looking to upgrade to a quad core processor, it would be best to wait for the next Phenom series that would hopefully sport 45nm process technology.

Technorati : , , , , , ,